Robert Schumann Op 12 N° 6 – Fabel Fantasiestücke, op. 12, a set of eight pieces for piano, was compos...
Title
00:00 | 00:00
00:00 | 00:00
URL:
This Week in Classical Music: August 11, 2025. On Musical Diversity. This week presents us with a group of composers who demonstrate the infinite diversity of music - not the artificial diversity that became fashionable in the early 2020s, but the genuine kind: the diversity of sound, style, and idiom. History selected this group for us, and we couldn’t have done much better ourselves. None of our composers belong to the Pantheon of the “greats,” but all were talented, and their music represents the period, the place, and, of course, their creativity. The mix is unusual as there are three Englishmen and not a single German, and while they span four centuries, some periods are missing. Even with these caveats, this accidental group represents tremendous variety. The oldest of our composers is Heinrich Ignaz Biber, an Austrian who was also a talented violinist; he was born in Bohemia on August 12th of 1644. His best-known compositions are a set of violin pieces titled “Rosary Sonatas.” Biber, like his contemporary Arcangelo Corelli, also a composer-violinist, worked in the Baroque style. Here’s one of the Rosary sonatas, no. 3.
Nicola Porpora, an Italian, was born 42 years after Biber, on August 17th of 1686. Porpora was born in Naples, a city famous for its opera and its singers. Porpora composed dozens of operas and was Handel’s rival in London. He was renowned as a voice teacher: among his students were Farinelli and Caffarelli, two of the most famous castrati singers. He also taught several composers, Haydn among them. Here’s the aria Alto Giove, from Porpora’s opera Poliferno. It’s also “baroque,” like Biber’s compositions, but how different in every sense!
Maurice Greene was just 10 years younger than Porpora (he was born on August 12th of 1696, in London). Greene is known for his anthems, of which Lord, Let Me Know Mine End is probably the most popular (here).
We have to jump over two centuries to get to Gabriel Pierné, a French composer born on August 16th of 1863, in Metz, capital of Lorraine. Seven years later, Lorraine was annexed by the victorious Germans, and Piernés moved to Paris. Gabriel studied with Jules Massenet and César Franck at the Paris Conservatory and won the Prix de Rome. Here’s the second movement of Pierné’s Piano Quintet.
Two Brits follow: Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, born on August 15th of 1875, and that most idiosyncratic of the composers, Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji; he was born August 14th, 1892. Coleridge-Taylor was biracial (his mother was English, his father – a descendant of freed slaves who settled in Sierra Leone). He was a popular composer, probably more so in the US than in the UK (it was a New York critic who called Coleridge-Taylor the “African Mahler”; during one of his trips to the US, he was invited to dinner by President Theodore Roosevelt). Like Coleridge-Taylor, Sorabji was also biracial, though it’s rarely brought up: his father was a Parsi from Bombay, his mother was English. Sorabji wrote some of the longest pieces in the history of Western music. His extravagantly titled work, Opus Clavicembalisticum, was once listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the longest piano piece ever composed: the complete performance runs about four hours. Here’s a much shorter piece, the first part of Sorabji’s Piano Sonata no. 1.
Finally, two more. An eclectic and delightful Frenchman, Jacques Ibert, born on August 15th of 1890, and Lukas Foss, one of the most original composers of his generation, who was born on the same day in 1922. Foss, a Jewish Berliner, emigrated to the US in 1937. Here’s Foss’s Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird. Let’s look back at where we started and compare Foss’s song with the pieces for the voice by Porpora and Green. This is what we call real diversity. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: August 4, 2025. France Musique. Three French composers were born this week: Cécile Chaminade, on August 8th of 1857, André Jolivet on the same day in 1905, and Reynaldo Hahn, on August 9th of 1874. Chaminade’s music was rarely performed till 2020, when her importance as a woman brought her work to the forefront of the classical repertoire, both in live performances and on the radio. We think that in her case, there’s some redeeming quality to that burst of enthusiasm, even if it’s fading again: Chaminade was a serious composer, if not very original, and encountered difficulties particular to her gender: we should not underestimate the misogyny of the critics of her time. Her music was well-accepted in her time, and she was even awarded the Légion d’Honneur. She composed over 400 pieces, most of which were published. Later in her life, Chaminade reverted to writing mostly smaller salon pieces, which became popular in England and the US, where many “Chaminade clubs” had been established. She made a trip to the US in 1912, visiting 12 cities. Here’s Chaminade’s popular Scarfe Dance. Lincoln Mayorga is the pianist.
We find André Jolivet’s music more interesting – but of course, he and Chaminade shouldn’t be compared, as Jolivet lived in a different time, half a century after Chaminade. Jolivet went through phases: he started as a follower of Debussy and Ravel; later, after hearing Schonberg’s music in 1927 (a rare occasion in France) he turned to the atonal idiom, encouraged by Edgard Varèse, an influential French-American avant-garde composer, and later by Olivier Messiaen. During WWII, he reverted to tonal music and was quite eclectic later in his life. You can read more about Jolivet here.
These days, Reynaldo Hahn is better known as Marcel Proust’s lover than as a composer. Hahn was born in Venezuela, but his family moved to Paris when he was three. He started composing when he was eight. At the age of ten, he entered the Paris Conservatory, where he studied with Massenet, Gounod, and Saint-Saëns. He was accepted into the popular salons of Paris when he was still in his late teens. It was in one of these salons that in 1894 he met Marcel Proust, then just an aspiring writer. Even though their affair was brief, they remained very good friends till Proust’s death in 1922. Hahn was half-Jewish and became a vociferous supporter of Dreyfus during the affair that split France in half (the half-Jewish Proust was also a Dreyfusard). Hahn became a naturalized Frenchman in 1907 and volunteered for the army at the outbreak of WWI. After the war, he composed several of his most popular pieces: the light opera Ciboulette and the Piano Concerto, which was premiered by Magda Tagliaferro. Here’s the Concerto; the soloist is Angelyne Pondepeyre, the Orchestre National de Lorraine is conducted by Fernand Quatrocchi. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 28, 2025. Catching up (yet again). This week isunusually fruitless: of the composers, there’s only Hans Rott, who was talented and mad, and died young. He wrote music that, in some ways, out-Mahlered the early Mahler. Rott was born in Vienna on August 1st of 1858, two years before Mahler, and died in a mental hospital at the age of 25 (as Robert Schumann did 28 years earlier, and Hugo Wolf would, 19 years later). We believe Rott had tremendous talent (Mahler thought he was “a musician of genius”), and who knows how much he could’ve created had he been healthy – as it was, Rott composed for just six years, from the age of 16 to 22, after which things went downhill. You can read more about Rott in our earlier entry and listen to the 3rd, probably the most “Mahlerian,” movement of his Symphony in E Major, subtitled Frisch und lebhaft (Fresh and lively) here. Paavo Järvi conducts the Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra.
By coincidence, this week there were few performers and conductors as well. To compensate for this paucity, we’ll turn back to the previous week, which at the time we dedicated to the New York Times and the deterioration of musical culture in our country. While we were commenting on woke philistines and the general decline of classical music, we missed several anniversaries, especially those of interpreters, pianists and singers in particular. So here we go.
July 23rd was the birthday of two pianists and one singer: Leon Fleisher and Maria João Pires, and Susan Graham. Leon Fleisher, who was born in San Francisco in 1928, was one of the greatest pianists of the 20th century (his performance of both Brahms’ piano concertos, with the Cleveland Orchestra and George Szell, was superlative). He established himself in the early 1950s and had a very successful career till 1964, when his right hand stopped working because of a neurological condition called focal dystonia. Undeterred, Fleisher switched to a left-hand repertoire, such as Ravel’s Concerto for the Left Hand and Prokofiev’s Piano Concerto no. 4. Fleisher returned to his regular repertoire in 2004, after 40 years of medical treatment. He was also a great teacher (André Watts, Yefim Bronfman, and Hélène Grimaud were among his many students).
Maria João Pires just turned 82, and she still performs. Born in Lisbon, she studied in Portugal and Germany. She launched her international career rather later, in the 1980s. Not being fond of a career as a star, she took long pauses between performance seasons, sometimes disappearing for years, as she did between 1978 and 1982. Pires’s Mozart is great, as is her Chopin, but of course, her repertoire is much broader than that: she also made wonderful recordings of Bach, Beethoven, Schubert and Schumann.
Susan Graham is 65, which is hard to believe; she’s one of the best mezzo-sopranos America has ever produced. Her Cherubino in Le nozze di Figaro and Rosina in Il barbiere di Siviglia are pure delight.
Isaac Stern was born on July 21st of 1920, 105 years ago. He was not just a great violinist; he was a cultural figure, the likes of which we greatly miss these days.
We should also mention two conductors: Igor Markevitch, who was also a composer. Born on July 27th of 1912, in Kiev, then the Russian Empire, he spent most of his life in France and Italy. Finally, Riccardo Muti turns 84 today. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 21, 2025. The New York Times and Classical Music. Several days ago, Variety magazine, a purveyor of entertainment news, had a scoop of a different kind: it obtained a New York Times internal memo, which detailed the reassignment of several cultural critics. The critics in question covered TV, pop music, theater, and included Zachary Woolfe, who writes about classical music. As part of the “revamp,” all of them were offered new positions within the newspaper, and at the moment, this leaves the NY Times without a classical music critic. This void made us think (again) about the role of music in our society in general and the Times in particular. Some years ago, it would’ve been unimaginable for the NY Times not to have a classical music critic: it was deemed so important that the paper had several writers covering multiple events and publishing many articles a week (Woolfe’s output was minuscule in comparison). We still remember the names of some of the great critics of the past: Harold Schonberg, the chief music critic for many years, Donal Henahan, who replaced him, and then followed by Edward Rothstein and Bernard Holland. Paul Griffiths also worked there, as did the wonderful Alex Ross, who later moved to the New Yorker and is one of the few who still publish interesting articles and books on music.
Not only was classical music important, but even the critics had a place in our culture: when Andrew Porter, who had written about music for 20 years at the New Yorker, resigned his position to move back to the UK, Edward Rothstein wrote a poignant article about him and his work. Some of the old coverage is unimaginable these days: for example, when, during a recital at Carnegie Hall, Kirsten Flagstad announced her retirement, the news made it to the front page of the Times. Yes, the front page.
It seems that two processes are working in parallel here: for one, classical music is losing its place in our culture, but secondly, newspapers are trying to get away from it at an even faster pace. For the lovers of classical music, the first trend is unfortunate but inevitable. We don’t live in the first quarter of the 20th century, when the parlor of every middle-class home was expected to have a piano, and piano manufacturers existed in every large city in the country (300,000 pianos were produced in 1924 when the US population was 1/3 its current size). Eventually, active music-making was replaced by passive listening: the radio and the phonograph killed the piano. Still, for a long time, music retained its cultural significance, and it was only at the end of the 20th century that the slide began in earnest. Whether this only coincided with the rise in identity politics or both processes fed on each other isn’t clear. But what we do know is that at some point, the cultural elites (and the NY Times is part and parcel of it) embraced identity politics and ran with it. During the worst days of wokeness, in 2020, Anthony Tomassini, then the chief (and by then practically the only) classical music critic of the Times, called for an end to blind additions, because, as he said, “the audition process should take into account race, gender and other factors,” not simply the talent or abilities of the performer. This absurd and pernicious notion was endorsed by many musical organizations and, what is worse, by foundations and endowments that constitute the financial base of classical music. In the meantime, classical music itself became associated with “dead white men,” a double offence when, for many in the cultural establishment, “white” became a sin, and “men” were linked to “toxic masculinity.” No wonder the Times decided to shy away from classical music.
Even though it seems that the worst of wokeness is behind us, what we have is classical music as a diminished art form, and the NY Times is partly responsible for the damage. Combine this with the paper’s past strong tradition in support of music, and you have an institution in a highly ambivalent position. We don’t expect the changes at the Times to improve on the mediocrity of the current state, but we’ll certainly watch the developments. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 14, 2025. Bastille Day. Today is the French national holiday, and we’ll play some music from that great country, without any pretense of a comprehensive survey.France has an incredibly long record of what we call “classical” music, dating back to medieval times: Leonin and Perotin lived in Paris in the second half of the 12th to early 13th centuries and worked at the recently built Notre-Dame Cathedral.They left a written record of their music, which can still be heard today performed by the old-music ensembles.
The Renaissance that followed brought us several important composers who were either French or Franco-Flemish, from what is now Belgium.Among them were Guillaume Dufay, considered by many the “founding father” of Renaissance music, and Gilles Binchois; both worked in the mid-15th century.A couple of generations later came Josquin des Prez, the most important composer of the last quarter of the 15th – first quarter of the 16th century.This vibrant milieu produced a plethora of composers, many on the French side of the border with Flanders.
The Baroque period was also rich in talent: we could mention just three stars: Jean-Baptiste Lully, François Couperin and Jean-Philippe Rameau.Here’s a section of a suite from Les Boréades, Rameau’s last opera. Les Musiciens du Louvre are conducted by Marc Minkowski.
Somewhat surprisingly, the French composers weren’t very productive during the Classical era (that was the domain of the Germans and Austrians), but they flourished in the following years during what we call the Romantic period. Hector Berlioz, Charles Gounod, César Franck (a Belgian by birth, he lived most of his productive life in Paris), Camille Saint-Saëns, Georges Bizet, and Jules Massenet are just the best-known names; there were many others.Berlioz stands somewhat alone, considering both the size of his talent and the audacity of some of his compositions.Here’s a symphonic interlude from his opera Les Troyens, which usually runs close to five hours.It’s called Chasse royale et orage (Royal hunt and thunderstorm); it is performed by the Orchestra of the Royal Opera House under the direction of Colin Davis.
Since the end of the 19th century, French composers have been at the forefront, while Paris has turned into a veritable Mecca for musicians from all over the world. The great Debussy was followed by the quirky Eric Satie and then the ever-popular Ravel (we have large samples of their works in our library).Les Six (Georges Auric, Louis Durey, Arthur Honegger, Darius Milhaud,Francis Poulenc, and Germaine Tailleferre) followed.Then came Olivier Messiaen, a great talent and the inspiration for a group of young composers who completely abandoned tonality and even went beyond the 12-tone system of Schoenberg and his pupils.Pierre Boulez was one of their leaders.
At the end of WWII, in 1944, Messiaen composed a set of twenty pieces for solo piano titled Vingt Regards sur l'Enfant-Jésus (Twenty Contemplations on the Infant Jesus).It was dedicated to his student, the pianist Yvonne Loriod, who later became Messiaen’s second wife.Here's one of the Regards, Regard de la Vierge (Contemplation of the Virgin).It’s performed by Pierre-Laurent Aimard.Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 7, 2025. Mahler and Antheil. There are several “semi-round” anniversaries this week, Mahler’s being the most significant: he was born on this day 165 years ago. Our readers may know how we feel and think about Gustav Mahler: not only was he one of the most important composers, he also became a litmus test of sorts – during the crazy woke days of 2020-2021, he completely disappeared from the musical scene, being singled out as the “really bad boy” of Western music. The trend was reversed a couple of years ago, and we’re happy to report that by now, Mahler has resumed his rightful place in classical repertory, both on stage and on the radio (he also never disappeared for real music lovers, who continued listening to his amazing music on streaming services and YouTube through those years).
George Antheil was born 125 years ago, on July 8th of 1900 in Trenton, NJ. Antheil had an interesting life: born into a German immigrant family, he was bilingual, started playing piano at the age of six, got involved with a modernist crowd when he was 19, and at 21 sailed to Europe, ready to make a name for himself as a “modern composer.” He spent a year in Berlin, where he met Stravinsky, and then moved to Paris. In Paris, Antheil lived in an apartment above Sylvia Beach’s bookstore, “Shakespeare and Co.” Beach took an interest in the young man and introduced him to several extraordinary Americans who lived in Paris in the 1920s, among them Ezra Pound, James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway, and Virgil Thomson. Antheil also became close with the Frenchmen Eric Satie and Jean Cocteau. The Paris years were a productive period for Antheil. He wrote several large piano pieces; during the premiere of one of them, Mechanisms, a riot broke out, to the composer’s delight (it made him, in his mind, equal to Stravinsky, whose premiere of the Rite of Spring was also met with a riot). Mechanisms was not the only piece that created a disturbance: Antheil’s Ballet Mécanique provoked the same reaction. The “ballet” was written as music to accompany the film by French painter Fernand Léger and American filmmaker Dudley Murphy. The effort was poorly coordinated, as Antheil’s music ran twice as long as the film, so the premiere presented the music on its own. It was scored (in its final, less extravagant form) for a pianola, several pianists, and airplane propellers that made a roaring noise when the pianos and the pianola stopped playing.
After another stint in Germany, Antheil returned to the US in 1933, pushed out by the Nazis. In 1936, he moved to Hollywood and became a very successful film composer, a far cry from his avant-garde days in Paris (the trajectory of Antheil’s life reminds us of Erich Wolfgang Korngold, a child prodigy who also settled for a life of film composing after emigrating to the US). In his later days, Antheil wrote some “serious” music, tonal and “neoromantic,” very different than what he was composing in his youth. He died of a heart attack in 1959.
Antheil had many interests: he wrote novels and worked as a literary critic. A most unusual thing happened after he met the Austrian-American actress Hedy Lamarr: the two of them invented what is called “frequency-hopping” for radio-controlled torpedoes. When a single frequency is used, it can be detected and then jammed by the enemy. The Lamarr-Antheil idea was to change frequencies rapidly, based on a code shared by the ship and the torpedo. There were 88 frequencies to be used – the number equal to the number of keys on a piano keyboard. The invention was patented by the actress and composer, but never implemented by the US Navy.
This Week in Classical Music: August 11, 2025. On Musical Diversity. This week presents us with a group of composers who demonstrate the infinite diversity of music - not the artificial diversity that became fashionable in the early 2020s, but the genuine kind: the diversity of sound,
style, and idiom. History selected this group for us, and we couldn’t have done much better ourselves. None of our composers belong to the Pantheon of the “greats,” but all were talented, and their music represents the period, the place, and, of course, their creativity. The mix is unusual as there are three Englishmen and not a single German, and while they span four centuries, some periods are missing. Even with these caveats, this accidental group represents tremendous variety. The oldest of our composers is Heinrich Ignaz Biber, an Austrian who was also a talented violinist; he was born in Bohemia on August 12th of 1644. His best-known compositions are a set of violin pieces titled “Rosary Sonatas.” Biber, like his contemporary Arcangelo Corelli, also a composer-violinist, worked in the Baroque style. Here’s one of the Rosary sonatas, no. 3.
Nicola Porpora, an Italian, was born 42 years after Biber, on August 17th of 1686. Porpora was born in Naples, a city famous for its opera and its singers. Porpora composed dozens of operas and was Handel’s rival in London. He was renowned as a voice teacher: among his students were Farinelli and Caffarelli, two of the most famous castrati singers. He also taught several composers, Haydn among them. Here’s the aria Alto Giove, from Porpora’s opera Poliferno. It’s also “baroque,” like Biber’s compositions, but how different in every sense!
Maurice Greene was just 10 years younger than Porpora (he was born on August 12th of 1696, in London). Greene is known for his anthems, of which Lord, Let Me Know Mine End is probably
the most popular (here).
We have to jump over two centuries to get to Gabriel Pierné, a French composer born on August 16th of 1863, in Metz, capital of Lorraine. Seven years later, Lorraine was annexed by the victorious Germans, and Piernés moved to Paris. Gabriel studied with Jules Massenet and César Franck at the Paris Conservatory and won the Prix de Rome. Here’s the second movement of Pierné’s Piano Quintet.
Two Brits follow: Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, born on August 15th of 1875, and that most idiosyncratic of the composers, Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji; he was born August 14th, 1892. Coleridge-Taylor was biracial (his mother was English, his father – a descendant of freed slaves who settled in Sierra Leone). He was a popular composer, probably more so in the US than in the UK (it was a New York critic who called Coleridge-Taylor the “African Mahler”; during one of his trips to the US, he was invited to dinner by President Theodore Roosevelt). Like
Coleridge-Taylor, Sorabji was also biracial, though it’s rarely brought up: his father was a Parsi from Bombay, his mother was English. Sorabji wrote some of the longest pieces in the history of Western music. His extravagantly titled work, Opus Clavicembalisticum, was once listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the longest piano piece ever composed: the complete performance runs about four hours. Here’s a much shorter piece, the first part of Sorabji’s Piano Sonata no. 1.
Finally, two more. An eclectic and delightful Frenchman, Jacques Ibert, born on August 15th of 1890, and Lukas Foss, one of the most original composers of his generation, who was born on the same day in 1922. Foss, a Jewish Berliner, emigrated to the US in 1937. Here’s Foss’s Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird. Let’s look back at where we started and compare Foss’s song with the pieces for the voice by Porpora and Green. This is what we call real diversity. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: August 4, 2025. France Musique. Three French composers were born this week: Cécile Chaminade, on August 8th of 1857, André Jolivet on the same day
in 1905, and Reynaldo Hahn, on August 9th of 1874. Chaminade’s music was rarely performed till 2020, when her importance as a woman brought her work to the forefront of the classical repertoire, both in live performances and on the radio. We think that in her case, there’s some redeeming quality to that burst of enthusiasm, even if it’s fading again: Chaminade was a serious composer, if not very original, and encountered difficulties particular to her gender: we should not underestimate the misogyny of the critics of her time. Her music was well-accepted in her time, and she was even awarded the Légion d’Honneur. She composed over 400 pieces, most of which were published. Later in her life, Chaminade reverted to writing mostly smaller salon pieces, which became popular in England and the US, where many “Chaminade clubs” had been established. She made a trip to the US in 1912, visiting 12 cities. Here’s Chaminade’s popular Scarfe Dance. Lincoln Mayorga is the pianist.
We find André Jolivet’s music more interesting – but of course, he and Chaminade shouldn’t be compared, as Jolivet lived in a different time, half a century after Chaminade. Jolivet went through phases: he started as a follower of Debussy and Ravel; later, after hearing Schonberg’s music in 1927 (a rare occasion in France) he turned to the atonal idiom, encouraged by Edgard Varèse, an influential French-American avant-garde composer, and later by Olivier Messiaen. During WWII, he reverted to tonal music and was quite eclectic later in his life.
You can read more about Jolivet here.
These days, Reynaldo Hahn is better known as Marcel Proust’s lover than as a composer. Hahn was born in Venezuela, but his family moved to Paris when he was three. He started composing when he was eight. At the age of ten, he entered the Paris Conservatory, where he studied with Massenet, Gounod, and Saint-Saëns. He was accepted into the popular salons of Paris when he was still in his late teens. It was in one of these salons that in 1894 he met Marcel Proust, then just an aspiring writer. Even though their affair was brief, they remained very good friends till Proust’s death in 1922. Hahn was half-Jewish and became a vociferous supporter of Dreyfus during the affair that split France in half (the half-Jewish Proust was also a Dreyfusard). Hahn became a naturalized Frenchman in 1907 and volunteered for the army at the outbreak of WWI. After the war, he composed several of his most popular pieces: the light opera Ciboulette and the Piano Concerto, which was premiered by Magda Tagliaferro. Here’s the Concerto; the soloist is Angelyne Pondepeyre, the Orchestre National de Lorraine is conducted by Fernand Quatrocchi. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 28, 2025. Catching up (yet again). This week is unusually fruitless: of the composers, there’s only Hans Rott, who was talented and mad, and died young.
He wrote music that, in some ways, out-Mahlered the early Mahler. Rott was born in Vienna on August 1st of 1858, two years before Mahler, and died in a mental hospital at the age of 25 (as Robert Schumann did 28 years earlier, and Hugo Wolf would, 19 years later). We believe Rott had tremendous talent (Mahler thought he was “a musician of genius”), and who knows how much he could’ve created had he been healthy – as it was, Rott composed for just six years, from the age of 16 to 22, after which things went downhill. You can read more about Rott in our earlier entry and listen to the 3rd, probably the most “Mahlerian,” movement of his Symphony in E Major, subtitled Frisch und lebhaft (Fresh and lively) here. Paavo Järvi conducts the Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra.
By coincidence, this week there were few performers and conductors as well. To compensate for this paucity, we’ll turn back to the previous week, which at the time we dedicated to the New York Times and the deterioration of musical culture in our country. While we were commenting on woke philistines and the general decline of classical music, we missed several anniversaries, especially those of interpreters, pianists and singers in particular. So here we go.
July 23rd was the birthday of two pianists and one singer: Leon Fleisher and Maria João Pires, and Susan Graham. Leon Fleisher, who was born in San Francisco in 1928, was one of the greatest pianists of the 20th century (his performance of both Brahms’ piano concertos, with the Cleveland Orchestra and George Szell, was superlative). He established himself in the early 1950s and had a very successful career till 1964, when his right hand stopped working because of a neurological condition called focal dystonia. Undeterred, Fleisher switched to a left-hand repertoire, such as Ravel’s Concerto for the Left Hand and Prokofiev’s Piano Concerto no. 4. Fleisher returned to his regular repertoire in 2004, after 40 years of medical treatment. He was also a great teacher (André Watts, Yefim Bronfman, and Hélène Grimaud were among his many students).
Maria João Pires just turned 82, and she still performs. Born in Lisbon, she studied in Portugal and Germany. She launched her international career rather later, in the 1980s. Not being fond of a career as a star, she took long pauses between performance seasons, sometimes disappearing for years, as she did between 1978 and 1982. Pires’s Mozart is great, as is her Chopin, but of course, her repertoire is much broader than that: she also made wonderful recordings of Bach, Beethoven, Schubert and Schumann.
Susan Graham is 65, which is hard to believe; she’s one of the best mezzo-sopranos America has ever produced. Her Cherubino in Le nozze di Figaro and Rosina in Il barbiere di Siviglia are pure delight.
Isaac Stern was born on July 21st of 1920, 105 years ago. He was not just a great violinist; he was a cultural figure, the likes of which we greatly miss these days.
We should also mention two conductors: Igor Markevitch, who was also a composer. Born on July 27th of 1912, in Kiev, then the Russian Empire, he spent most of his life in France and Italy. Finally, Riccardo Muti turns 84 today. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 21, 2025. The New York Times and Classical Music. Several days ago, Variety magazine, a purveyor of entertainment news, had a scoop of a different
kind: it obtained a New York Times internal memo, which detailed the reassignment of several cultural critics. The critics in question covered TV, pop music, theater, and included Zachary Woolfe, who writes about classical music. As part of the “revamp,” all of them were offered new positions within the newspaper, and at the moment, this leaves the NY Times without a classical music critic. This void made us think (again) about the role of music in our society in general and the Times in particular. Some years ago, it would’ve been unimaginable for the NY Times not to have a classical music critic: it was deemed so important that the paper had several writers covering multiple events and publishing many articles a week (Woolfe’s output was minuscule in comparison). We still remember the names of some of the great critics of the past: Harold Schonberg, the chief music critic for many years, Donal Henahan, who replaced him, and then followed by Edward Rothstein and Bernard Holland. Paul Griffiths also worked there, as did the wonderful Alex Ross, who later moved to the New Yorker and is one of the few who still publish interesting articles and books on music.
Not only was classical music important, but even the critics had a place in our culture: when Andrew Porter, who had written about music for 20 years at the New Yorker, resigned his position to move back to the UK, Edward Rothstein wrote a poignant article about him and his work. Some of the old coverage is unimaginable these days: for example, when, during a recital at Carnegie Hall, Kirsten Flagstad announced her retirement, the news made it to the front page of the Times. Yes, the front page.
It seems that two processes are working in parallel here: for one, classical music is losing its place in our culture, but secondly, newspapers are trying to get away from it at an even faster pace. For the lovers of classical music, the first trend is unfortunate but inevitable. We don’t live in the first quarter of the 20th century, when the parlor of every middle-class home was expected to have a piano, and piano manufacturers existed in every large city in the country (300,000 pianos were produced in 1924 when the US population was 1/3 its current size). Eventually, active music-making was replaced by passive listening: the radio and the phonograph killed the piano. Still, for a long time, music retained its cultural significance, and it was only at the end of the 20th century that the slide began in earnest. Whether this only coincided with the rise in identity politics or both processes fed on each other isn’t clear. But what we do know is that at some point, the cultural elites (and the NY Times is part and parcel of it) embraced identity politics and ran with it. During the worst days of wokeness, in 2020, Anthony Tomassini, then the chief (and by then practically the only) classical music critic of the Times, called for an end to blind additions, because, as he said, “the audition process should take into account race, gender and other factors,” not simply the talent or abilities of the performer. This absurd and pernicious notion was endorsed by many musical organizations and, what is worse, by foundations and endowments that constitute the financial base of classical music. In the meantime, classical music itself became associated with “dead white men,” a double offence when, for many in the cultural establishment, “white” became a sin, and “men” were linked to “toxic masculinity.” No wonder the Times decided to shy away from classical music.
Even though it seems that the worst of wokeness is behind us, what we have is classical music as a diminished art form, and the NY Times is partly responsible for the damage. Combine this with the paper’s past strong tradition in support of music, and you have an institution in a highly ambivalent position. We don’t expect the changes at the Times to improve on the mediocrity of the current state, but we’ll certainly watch the developments. Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 14, 2025. Bastille Day. Today is the French national holiday, and we’ll play some music from that great country, without any pretense of a
comprehensive survey. France has an incredibly long record of what we call “classical” music, dating back to medieval times: Leonin and Perotin lived in Paris in the second half of the 12th to early 13th centuries and worked at the recently built Notre-Dame Cathedral. They left a written record of their music, which can still be heard today performed by the old-music ensembles.
The Renaissance that followed brought us several important composers who were either French or Franco-Flemish, from what is now Belgium. Among them were Guillaume Dufay, considered by many the “founding father” of Renaissance music, and Gilles Binchois; both worked in the mid-15th century. A couple of generations later came Josquin des Prez, the most important composer of the last quarter of the 15th – first quarter of the 16th century. This vibrant milieu produced a plethora of composers, many on the French side of the border with Flanders.
The Baroque period was also rich in talent: we could mention just three stars: Jean-Baptiste Lully, François Couperin and Jean-Philippe Rameau. Here’s a section of a suite from Les Boréades, Rameau’s last opera. Les Musiciens du Louvre are conducted by Marc Minkowski.
Somewhat surprisingly, the French composers weren’t very productive during the Classical era (that was the domain of the Germans and Austrians), but they flourished in the following years during what we call the Romantic period. Hector Berlioz, Charles Gounod, César Franck (a Belgian by birth, he lived most of his productive life in Paris), Camille Saint-Saëns, Georges Bizet, and Jules Massenet are just the best-known names; there were many others. Berlioz stands somewhat alone, considering both the size of his talent and the audacity of some of his compositions. Here’s a symphonic interlude from his opera Les Troyens, which usually runs close to five hours. It’s called Chasse royale et orage (Royal hunt and thunderstorm); it is performed by the Orchestra of the Royal Opera House under the direction of Colin Davis.
Since the end of the 19th century, French composers have been at the forefront, while Paris has turned into a veritable Mecca for musicians from all over the world. The great Debussy was followed by the quirky Eric Satie and then the ever-popular Ravel (we have large samples of their works in our library). Les Six (Georges Auric, Louis Durey, Arthur Honegger, Darius Milhaud, Francis Poulenc, and Germaine Tailleferre) followed. Then came Olivier Messiaen, a great talent and the inspiration for a group of young composers who completely abandoned tonality and even went beyond the 12-tone system of Schoenberg and his pupils. Pierre Boulez was one of their leaders.
At the end of WWII, in 1944, Messiaen composed a set of twenty pieces for solo piano titled Vingt Regards sur l'Enfant-Jésus (Twenty Contemplations on the Infant Jesus). It was dedicated to his student, the pianist Yvonne Loriod, who later became Messiaen’s second wife. Here's one of the Regards, Regard de la Vierge (Contemplation of the Virgin). It’s performed by Pierre-Laurent Aimard.Permalink
This Week in Classical Music: July 7, 2025. Mahler and Antheil. There are several “semi-round” anniversaries this week, Mahler’s being the most significant: he was born on this day 165
years ago. Our readers may know how we feel and think about Gustav Mahler: not only was he one of the most important composers, he also became a litmus test of sorts – during the crazy woke days of 2020-2021, he completely disappeared from the musical scene, being singled out as the “really bad boy” of Western music. The trend was reversed a couple of years ago, and we’re happy to report that by now, Mahler has resumed his rightful place in classical repertory, both on stage and on the radio (he also never disappeared for real music lovers, who continued listening to his amazing music on streaming services and YouTube through those years).
George Antheil was born 125 years ago, on July 8th of 1900 in Trenton, NJ. Antheil had an interesting life: born into a German immigrant family, he was bilingual, started playing piano at the age of six, got involved with a modernist crowd
when he was 19, and at 21 sailed to Europe, ready to make a name for himself as a “modern composer.” He spent a year in Berlin, where he met Stravinsky, and then moved to Paris. In Paris, Antheil lived in an apartment above Sylvia Beach’s bookstore, “Shakespeare and Co.” Beach took an interest in the young man and introduced him to several extraordinary Americans who lived in Paris in the 1920s, among them Ezra Pound, James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway, and Virgil Thomson. Antheil also became close with the Frenchmen Eric Satie and Jean Cocteau. The Paris years were a productive period for Antheil. He wrote several large piano pieces; during the premiere of one of them, Mechanisms, a riot broke out, to the composer’s delight (it made him, in his mind, equal to Stravinsky, whose premiere of the Rite of Spring was also met with a riot). Mechanisms was not the only piece that created a disturbance: Antheil’s Ballet Mécanique provoked the same reaction. The “ballet” was written as music to accompany the film by French painter Fernand Léger and American filmmaker Dudley Murphy. The effort was poorly coordinated, as Antheil’s music ran twice as long as the film, so the premiere presented the music on its own. It was scored (in its final, less extravagant form) for a pianola, several pianists, and airplane propellers that made a roaring noise when the pianos and the pianola stopped playing.
After another stint in Germany, Antheil returned to the US in 1933, pushed out by the Nazis. In 1936, he moved to Hollywood and became a very successful film composer, a far cry from his avant-garde days in Paris (the trajectory of Antheil’s life reminds us of Erich Wolfgang Korngold, a child prodigy who also settled for a life of film composing after emigrating to the US). In his later days, Antheil wrote some “serious” music, tonal and “neoromantic,” very different than what he was composing in his youth. He died of a heart attack in 1959.
Antheil had many interests: he wrote novels and worked as a literary critic. A most unusual thing happened after he met the Austrian-American actress Hedy Lamarr: the two of them invented what is called “frequency-hopping” for radio-controlled torpedoes. When a single frequency is used, it can be detected and then jammed by the enemy. The Lamarr-Antheil idea was to change frequencies rapidly, based on a code shared by the ship and the torpedo. There were 88 frequencies to be used – the number equal to the number of keys on a piano keyboard. The invention was patented by the actress and composer, but never implemented by the US Navy.
We’ll post samples of his music later this week.
Permalink